天涯明月刀
2 sentenced in China’s first criminal case over leaks of unreleased Genshin Impact and miHoYo game content_我的网站
A |
南高加索小国格鲁吉亚议会三读通过了一项名为《外国影响力透明法》的法案。 
A criminal case involving information leaks related to miHoYo, the developer of Genshin Impact, has reached its first-instance verdict. Two Bilibili (Chinese video-sharing platform) users were found guilty of copyright infringement and were sentenced to one year and two months and one year in prison, respectively, both with probation. It is the first criminal game leak case under a new judicial interpretation issued by China's top judicial authorities, according to miHoYo.
The infringing videos uploaded by Su and Wu received more than 600,000 and 300,000 views, respectively, exceeding the criminal prosecution thresholds stipulated under the judicial interpretation. The court therefore found that the two individuals met the criteria for criminal prosecution and handed down guilty verdicts.
During routine monitoring, in July 2025, miHoYo discovered that Su and Wu had repeatedly uploaded gameplay videos featuring unreleased versions of miHoYo titles, including Genshin Impact, Honkai: Star Rail and Zenless Zone Zero, without any authorization from the company. The videos, widely circulated within gaming communities, exposed unreleased characters, skill animations and other content that had not yet been officially introduced to players, miHoYo noted.
After discovering the alleged violations, miHoYo reported the case to the police in accordance with legal procedures. Following an investigation, the police arrested the two individuals involved.
The case was publicly heard and the verdict was delivered on April 24, 2026. The court ruled that Su was to be sentenced to one year and two months in prison with probation, while Wu was sentenced to one year of detention with probation, according to miHoYo.
Guo Hao, a Beijing-based lawyer, told the Global Times on Thursday that a key significance of the case lies in its further clarification of how game leak cases can be assessed under the Criminal Law.
"In the past, game leaks were more often handled through civil infringement claims or breach-of-contract disputes. In this case, however, the court did not simply determine liability based on whether content was released ahead of schedule," Guo said. "Instead, it considered factors including the scale of dissemination, the nature of the leaked content and the impact caused, and determined that the conduct met the prosecution threshold for the crime of copyright infringement."
Similar game leak incidents have also occurred overseas in recent years. In October 2024, The Pokemon Company suffered a data breach that resulted in large amounts of internal information being leaked online, including employees' personal information, according to overseas media reports. Dubbed the "Teraleak" by the gaming community, the incident was reportedly one of the largest game-related leaks in recent years. The leaked materials reportedly included game source codes, details of future projects and other internal information, according to Nintendo Life, a UK-based gaming news outlet.
Earlier, Nintendo had pursued legal action over the leak of a Pokemon Sword and Shield strategy guide in 2019. According to gaming website Polygon, The Pokémon Company later reached a settlement with the two individuals responsible, who were required to pay $150,000 each in damages.
"From a player's perspective, there is a clear difference between game leaks and normal game discussions," Lu, a member from the Steam gaming community, told the Global Times on Thursday. "Players discussing and analyzing officially released information is part of gaming culture, but obtaining and spreading unreleased content through unauthorized channels can harm the efforts of developers and affect the experience of the entire player community."
Such concerns are also shared by game developers, who view unreleased content as a key part of their creative and commercial plans.
A post by miHoYo on its online account specifies that every unreleased frame of game content represents the design and refinement efforts of its creative teams, while also carrying players' expectations for upcoming updates. Unauthorized early exposure of such content not only infringes upon miHoYo's copyright interests, but also takes away the surprise that players should have when experiencing new content for the first time.
。
A criminal case involving information leaks related to miHoYo, the developer of Genshin Impact, has reached its first-instance verdict. Two Bilibili (Chinese video-sharing platform) users were found guilty of copyright infringement and were sentenced to one year and two months and one year in prison, respectively, both with probation. It is the first criminal game leak case under a new judicial interpretation issued by China's top judicial authorities, according to miHoYo.
The infringing videos uploaded by Su and Wu received more than 600,000 and 300,000 views, respectively, exceeding the criminal prosecution thresholds stipulated under the judicial interpretation. The court therefore found that the two individuals met the criteria for criminal prosecution and handed down guilty verdicts.
During routine monitoring, in July 2025, miHoYo discovered that Su and Wu had repeatedly uploaded gameplay videos featuring unreleased versions of miHoYo titles, including Genshin Impact, Honkai: Star Rail and Zenless Zone Zero, without any authorization from the company. The videos, widely circulated within gaming communities, exposed unreleased characters, skill animations and other content that had not yet been officially introduced to players, miHoYo noted.
After discovering the alleged violations, miHoYo reported the case to the police in accordance with legal procedures. Following an investigation, the police arrested the two individuals involved.
The case was publicly heard and the verdict was delivered on April 24, 2026. The court ruled that Su was to be sentenced to one year and two months in prison with probation, while Wu was sentenced to one year of detention with probation, according to miHoYo.
Guo Hao, a Beijing-based lawyer, told the Global Times on Thursday that a key significance of the case lies in its further clarification of how game leak cases can be assessed under the Criminal Law.
"In the past, game leaks were more often handled through civil infringement claims or breach-of-contract disputes. In this case, however, the court did not simply determine liability based on whether content was released ahead of schedule," Guo said. "Instead, it considered factors including the scale of dissemination, the nature of the leaked content and the impact caused, and determined that the conduct met the prosecution threshold for the crime of copyright infringement."
Similar game leak incidents have also occurred overseas in recent years. In October 2024, The Pokemon Company suffered a data breach that resulted in large amounts of internal information being leaked online, including employees' personal information, according to overseas media reports. Dubbed the "Teraleak" by the gaming community, the incident was reportedly one of the largest game-related leaks in recent years. The leaked materials reportedly included game source codes, details of future projects and other internal information, according to Nintendo Life, a UK-based gaming news outlet.
Earlier, Nintendo had pursued legal action over the leak of a Pokemon Sword and Shield strategy guide in 2019. According to gaming website Polygon, The Pokémon Company later reached a settlement with the two individuals responsible, who were required to pay $150,000 each in damages.
"From a player's perspective, there is a clear difference between game leaks and normal game discussions," Lu, a member from the Steam gaming community, told the Global Times on Thursday. "Players discussing and analyzing officially released information is part of gaming culture, but obtaining and spreading unreleased content through unauthorized channels can harm the efforts of developers and affect the experience of the entire player community."
Such concerns are also shared by game developers, who view unreleased content as a key part of their creative and commercial plans.
A post by miHoYo on its online account specifies that every unreleased frame of game content represents the design and refinement efforts of its creative teams, while also carrying players' expectations for upcoming updates. Unauthorized early exposure of such content not only infringes upon miHoYo's copyright interests, but also takes away the surprise that players should have when experiencing new content for the first time.
。
能通过这份法案可不容易，自从去年2月份首次被提交到议会开始，格鲁吉亚境内就出现了大规模的暴动抗议活动，甚至出现了再次爆发颜色革命的风险。
有意思的事，当格鲁吉亚议会通过该法案之后，美国“急了”，直接回应称：“如果格鲁吉亚总统不否决这份过分的法案，美国将会从根本上重新考虑和格鲁吉亚的关系……”
明明是格鲁吉亚的内政，美国人为什么这么急切的蹦出来，甚至不惜进行威胁呢？
《外国影响力透明法》规定，格鲁吉亚境内有20％的收入是来自境外的组织，必须要专门进行登记，方便管理。如果不登记的话，会处以10000美元的罚款。
很明显，不管从哪个方面看，这都是一个再正常不过的法案，有利于国家政权的稳定。
毕竟，美西方搞出来的那些NGO组织绝大多数都是带有政治目的的，可以说是颜色革命的幕后重要推手。
就连一直宣称“捍卫言论自由”的美国自己，也早在1938年就出台了《外国代理人登记法》（Foreign Agents Registration Act）。
B | 而且美国人毫不讳言的说了，出台这个法案就是为了“坚决防止国外势力渗透美国，并监督外国公司和组织在美国从事和政治有关的活动。”
然而，美国人自己能出台这个法案，却坚决反对别的国家出台这个法案。别问，问就是“言论自由”。
C |
格鲁吉亚出台“外国代理人”法案是有十分确切的理由的。
D |
自从格鲁吉亚从苏联独立这30多年来，一直积极的向美西方靠拢，导致该国被西方渗透的厉害。
尤其是2003年格鲁吉亚爆发的“玫瑰革命”，美西方渗透进来的NGO组织是从中出了大力的。
而颜色革命之后很长时间，格鲁吉亚都没有亲俄派。新上台的总统在5年之后主动挑起了俄格战争，虽然格鲁吉亚输了，但美国和欧洲赢了，格鲁吉亚自此变成了最为反俄的国家之一。
现在的格鲁吉亚执政党是“格鲁吉亚梦想—民主格鲁吉亚”党，它在去年的时候就推出过这个法案。
孰料，法案刚刚一读通过，格鲁吉亚立马就爆发了大规模的抗议。
抗议理由十分的无厘头：“这是一份‘俄罗斯法案’！”
被美西方控制的格鲁吉亚反对派很明显根本不会让这种法案通过的，于是他们就开始煽动民众上街，说2012年俄罗斯就出台了“外国代理人”法案，执政党出台同样的法案，是要全面投靠俄罗斯，放弃融入欧洲！
现任格鲁吉亚总统祖拉比什维利自小就在法国长大，甚至曾是法国驻格鲁吉亚大使，自然是亲西方的。
她不但公开反对这份法案，说“如果通过这份法案我们将无法融入欧洲”，还放言：“只有莫斯科的独裁政权才会通过这种法案。”
这是全然不把美国、英国、澳大利亚等早就通过类似法案的国家放在眼里。
在巨大的压力下，格鲁吉亚议会认怂，撤回了相关法案。
如今一年时间过去，“格鲁吉亚梦想—民主格鲁吉亚”党在4月初又一次向议会提交了这一法案。相较于去年那一份法案，只是把文中“外国影响代理人”改成了更为直接的“为外国势力利益效力的组织”。
E |
相当于直接摊牌了：“我知道这些玩意就是为美西方服务的，我就是要限制它们。”
不出意外的，不甘心受限制的NGO组织又联合格鲁吉亚反对派，煽动民众上街抗议了。
只是他们没想到，这一次格鲁吉亚议会的态度空前的强硬，硬是顶着再次爆发颜色革命的风险，三读通过法案，就等着总统签字了。
根据美西方的强盗逻辑，我可以随便渗透你，甚至发动颜色革命，但你不能渗透我。如果你不同意，就是“造反”。
据法新社报道，美国白宫新闻秘书卡里娜·让－皮埃尔在新闻发布会上直截了当的对格鲁吉亚进行了威胁：
“我们对格鲁吉亚‘克里姆林宫式’的外国代理人立法深感不安。
F | 如果这项立法最终获得通过，将迫使我们从根本上重新评估我们与格鲁吉亚的关系。”
格鲁吉亚一个南高加索国家，美国山高皇帝远，就算它真出事了也鞭长莫及，既然要表态，也应该是欧盟表态啊，为什么是美国自己跳出来表态呢？
据塔斯社报道，格鲁吉亚议会二读通过法案的时候，冯德莱恩就第一时间跳了出来，说“严重关切”：
“我严重关切格鲁吉亚局势，并谴责第比利斯街头的暴力活动。鲁吉亚人民希望自己的国家在未来加入欧盟。格鲁吉亚正处于十字路口。它应该继续走在通往欧洲的道路上。
G | ”
意思就是，你要是想“脱亚入欧”，成为欧盟这个“相亲相爱大家庭”的一员，就必须乖乖的接受美国的渗透，否则就别想了。
谁曾想，格鲁吉亚这么“头铁”，哪怕是加入不了欧盟，哪怕是可能爆发颜色革命被推翻，也要国家独立自主。
H |
不管格鲁吉亚的这个法案最终能不能通过，现政府会不会因为颜色革命倒台，他们这份追求国家独立，不受外国摆布的决心，还是值得我们尊重的。
Current article:http://mjorms.nenyaogecebenliexi.shop/list_9dj2/4w6hzv.html
Published on:17:33:06